Katawa Shoujo Forums

Um.

Our team number is 167809, not 167804. No idea where that came from.

I have a second place to defend no I'm not bitter why would you think I was bitter :<

Man, last time I had to put a lock on a thread for this specific brand of bullshit was back in 2014...

It was a good run. I could have enjoyed it being longer.

Please go read the FAQs and the various sticky informational posts. It's becoming obvious that you haven't done any of that yet.

The FAQs also ban discussion pertaining to illegitimately leaked files, so your not linking them does not make you safe here. What's saving you is that Grid 1 is not an illegitimate leak - we linked it ourselves several times. I don't even know what the Flow Test, Installer Test, and Jog Scene are s...

It's never, quote, 'spread too far to be corrected', unquote.

EVER.

AAARGH. Sorry Corner, you. Two EONS.

Oddball wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:02 pm There are some, but if I wrote them out for you they wouldn't be unwritten anymore.

Currently undecided on whether to respond with "well-played... " or " don't tease the newbies "

But yeah, what he said. Tips section's where it's at.

StilesLong wrote: ↑Sun Dec 23, 2018 12:25 pm ...something?

Yeah, that was barely worth the electrons expended in its composition.

No violations this time, but still a sterling example of why the "no requesting" sticky exists, really.

Writings of porn require the target audience to be willing to read . That's too rare to be an effective spamming strategy. :mrgreen: No, just your garden-variety porn links and pics. As a correction, after reviewing the logs it was actually a spamflood of posts (as in, added to pre-existing threads)...

Dunno what I could freely add to that, what do you mean by "nature"? I actually went and checked the forum logs of the incident (they reach that far back, unbelievable) and found a few IPs and unregistered usernames, but I'm not disclosing those.

I remember the specific instigator of that change - an agile-IP spamflood of porn threads, which for obvious reasons are no longer available to link. If you decide to believe me, you'll have to take my word for it.

That's significantly beyond "a bit" disrespectful. Doubly so if, as you seem to imply, you have actually performed editing work to make the whole thing fit your idea of writing flow. Link removed. Either you credit properly every author and individually ask them for permission to do what y...

It's not definite, but it could be. Try looking up "garlic eaters". The rest is left as an exercise for the reader.

Or he could just be Korean. Buuut, definitely not Italian. Nope, not that.